Re: max time in a table query takes ages - Mailing list pgsql-general
From | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Subject | Re: max time in a table query takes ages |
Date | |
Msg-id | 162867790810230348m38baf1i9121eae8622894d7@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | max time in a table query takes ages ("Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz" <gryzman@gmail.com>) |
Responses |
Re: max time in a table query takes ages
|
List | pgsql-general |
Hello try VACUUM and REINDEX regards Pavel Stehule 2008/10/23 Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman@gmail.com>: > hey folks > > I have a simple query over a fairly simple query here, that scans for max > date in a table that's fairly hudge (300M rows). there's index on that field > that's being used, but for whatever reason, it takes ages. Ideas ? > > select date_trunc('day', max(data)) into dt from staticstats where > processed = false > > explain analyze: > > QUERY PLAN > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Result (cost=3.89..3.90 rows=1 width=0) (actual > time=2558459.883..2558459.884 rows=1 loops=1) > InitPlan > -> Limit (cost=0.00..3.89 rows=1 width=8) (actual > time=2558362.751..2558362.753 rows=1 loops=1) > -> Index Scan Backward using sstats_date_idx on staticstats > (cost=0.00..1566198296.88 rows=402561795 width=8) (actual > time=2558362.747..2558362.747 rows=1 loops=1) > Filter: ((data IS NOT NULL) AND (NOT processed)) > Total runtime: 2558540.800 ms > (6 rows) > > Time: 2558545.012 ms > > one thing I am amazed by, is the filter data is not null, well - take a look > at the schema here: > > staty=> \d+ staticstats > Table "public.staticstats" > Column | Type | Modifiers | Description > -----------+--------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------+------------- > data | timestamp(0) without time zone | not null | > size | integer | not null default 0 | > proto | integer | not null | > macfrom | integer | not null | > macto | integer | not null | > processed | boolean | not null default false | > id | bigint | not null default nextval('sstatic_id_seq'::regclass) | > Indexes: > "blah123s" PRIMARY KEY, btree (macto, data, proto, macfrom) > "sstats_id_idx" UNIQUE, btree (id) > "sstats_date_idx" btree (data) > "staticstat_processed_idxs" btree (processed) > Foreign-key constraints: > "staty_fk1s" FOREIGN KEY (macfrom) REFERENCES macs(id) > "staty_fks" FOREIGN KEY (macto) REFERENCES macs(id) > Has OIDs: no > > it takes ms if there's somethign that's been recently added to that table. > The table itself is vacuumed/analyzed quite often, and more or less > clustered by sstats_date_idx - althrough in that instance, I wasn't able to > recluster it - because there's not enough disc space (only 45GB free, and > for whatever reason - even tho the table is only about 25GB in size - > postgresql requires more than 40GB of space to recluster it). > > any hints please ? > > -- > > GJ >
pgsql-general by date: