2009/7/8 Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de>:
> --On Dienstag, Juli 07, 2009 18:07:08 -0400 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> wrote:
>
>> Enum. If we do this then it seems entirely fair that someone might
>> want other settings someday. Also, it seems silly to pick a format
>> partly on the grounds that it's expansible, and then not make the
>> control GUC expansible. Perhaps
>>
>> SET bytea_output = [ hex | traditional ]
>
> I like the enum much better, too, but
>
> SET bytea_output = [ hex | escape ]
+ 1
Pavel
>
> looks better to me (encode/decode are using something like this already).
>
> --
> Thanks
>
> Bernd
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
