Re: numeric_big in make check? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: numeric_big in make check?
Date
Msg-id 181410.1708442160@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: numeric_big in make check?  (Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: numeric_big in make check?
List pgsql-hackers
Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> writes:
> Looking at the script itself, the addition, subtraction,
> multiplication and division tests at the top are probably pointless,
> since I would expect those operations to be tested adequately (and
> probably more thoroughly) by the transcendental test cases. In fact, I
> think it would probably be OK to delete everything above line 650, and
> just keep the bottom half of the script -- the pow(), exp(), ln() and
> log() tests, which cover various edge cases, as well as exercising
> basic arithmetic operations internally.

I could go with that, but let's just transpose those into numeric.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dean Rasheed
Date:
Subject: Re: bug report: some issues about pg_15_stable(8fa4a1ac61189efffb8b851ee77e1bc87360c445)
Next
From: Dean Rasheed
Date:
Subject: Re: numeric_big in make check?