Re: column ordering, was Re: [PATCHES] Enums patch v2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: column ordering, was Re: [PATCHES] Enums patch v2
Date
Msg-id 19759.1166716259@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: column ordering, was Re: [PATCHES] Enums patch v2  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Responses Re: column ordering, was Re: [PATCHES] Enums patch v2
List pgsql-hackers
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
> The thing is, physical index numbers has meaning, the logical index
> number does not. In a view definition we're going to store the physical
> index, not the logical one, for example.

Really?  To me that's one of a large number of questions that are
unresolved about how we'd do this.  You can make a case for either
choice in quite a number of places.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: New version of money type
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: ERROR: tuple concurrently updated