More PostgreSQL+CORBA - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Michael Robinson |
---|---|
Subject | More PostgreSQL+CORBA |
Date | |
Msg-id | 199811131719.BAA26341@public.bta.net.cn Whole thread Raw |
Responses |
Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA
Re: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA |
List | pgsql-hackers |
CORBA in fifty words or less: CORBA is an architecture which specifies how to: - define the method signatures of anobject type - obtain a reference to a object instance - invoke a method, with parameters, on an object instance - receive the results - all interoperably between different programming languages, object implementations, andplatforms. Why CORBA? If you don't do object-oriented programming and system design, the rationale for CORBA will be hard to understand. If you don't understand why PostgreSQL is called an "object-relational" database (and why every row has anOID), the rationale for PostgreSQL+CORBA will be hard to understand. The short version goes like this: Thinkof a database table as a "typedef" of a data structure, with each row representing a malloc'ed instance of that structuretype. The database provides for persistant storage, and concurrent data access, but with a considerable accessoverhead: sending an SQL query string down a socket, parsing the query string into an execution plan, executing the plan, coverting the returned result set into text strings, sending the strings down a socket, retrieving the stringsfrom the socket, and, finally, converting the text strings back into usable data values. With CORBA, though,you could keep a reference (OID, pointer, etc.) to each data structure of interest, and just call a function toread or write data to fields in that structure. Another way to think of it is cursors without queries. The database(PostgreSQL in our case) continues to maintain persistence and concurrent access, and the data is also alwaysavailable for relational queries. Which ORB? GNOME started with Mico. Mico, apparently, makes use of C++ templates, which caused the compiler they wereusing to generate bloated, wallowing code. GNOME then adopted ORBit, which has two wins: it's in C, and (thisis the biggy) it has provisions to shortcut parameter marshalling, transmission, authentication, reception, anddemarshalling--if the client stub and server skeleton are in the same address space, and both stub and skeleton permitthis. This means that, with ORBit, CORBA method calls can be almost as efficient as normal function calls. How to use CORBA with PostgreSQL? There are three ways I can see this working: 1. As a simple alternative for the current FE<->BE communication protocol. The SQL query engine continues to intermediateall transactions. This has some benefits, but is really boring to me. 2. As an alternative to both the FE<->BE communication protocol and the SQL query engine. In this case, programscould have efficient direct row access, but all data transfers would still be shoved through a socket (viathe Internet Inter-Orb Protocol). This could be useful, and mildly interesting. 3. As an alternative API to libpq that would allow, for example, embedding a Python interpreter in the backend, withPostgreSQL tables exposed through CORBA as native Python classes, and with high performance via ORBit methodshortcutting. This, in my opinion, would be the most useful and interesting. -Michael Robinson
pgsql-hackers by date: