Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Subject | Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size |
Date | |
Msg-id | 199909271833.OAA11252@candle.pha.pa.us Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>) |
Responses |
Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
Tom, you already handled this, right? > >Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp> writes: > >> Just for a testing I made a huge table (>2GB and it has 10000000 > >> tuples). copy 10000000 tuples took 23 minutes. This is not so > >> bad. Vacuum analyze took 11 minutes, not too bad. After this I created > >> an index on int4 column. It took 9 minutes. Next I deleted 5000000 > >> tuples to see how long delete took. I found it was 6 > >> minutes. Good. Then I ran into a problem. After that I did vacuum > >> analyze, and seemed it took forever! (actually took 47 minutes). The > >> biggest problem was postgres's process size. It was 478MB! This is not > >> acceptable for me. Any idea? > > > >Yeah, I've complained about that before --- it seems that vacuum takes > >a really unreasonable amount of time to remove dead tuples from an index. > >It's been like that at least since 6.3.2, probably longer. > > Hiroshi came up with a work around for this(see included > patches). After applying it, the process size shrinked from 478MB to > 86MB! (the processing time did not descrease, however). According to > him, repalloc seems not very effective with large number of calls. The > patches probably descreases the number to 1/10. > -- > Tatsuo Ishii > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > *** vacuum.c.orig Sat Jul 3 09:32:40 1999 > --- vacuum.c Thu Aug 19 17:34:18 1999 > *************** > *** 2519,2530 **** > static void > vc_vpinsert(VPageList vpl, VPageDescr vpnew) > { > > /* allocate a VPageDescr entry if needed */ > if (vpl->vpl_num_pages == 0) > ! vpl->vpl_pagedesc = (VPageDescr *) palloc(100 * sizeof(VPageDescr)); > ! else if (vpl->vpl_num_pages % 100 == 0) > ! vpl->vpl_pagedesc = (VPageDescr *) repalloc(vpl->vpl_pagedesc, (vpl->vpl_num_pages + 100) * sizeof(VPageDescr)); > vpl->vpl_pagedesc[vpl->vpl_num_pages] = vpnew; > (vpl->vpl_num_pages)++; > > --- 2519,2531 ---- > static void > vc_vpinsert(VPageList vpl, VPageDescr vpnew) > { > + #define PG_NPAGEDESC 1000 > > /* allocate a VPageDescr entry if needed */ > if (vpl->vpl_num_pages == 0) > ! vpl->vpl_pagedesc = (VPageDescr *) palloc(PG_NPAGEDESC * sizeof(VPageDescr)); > ! else if (vpl->vpl_num_pages % PG_NPAGEDESC == 0) > ! vpl->vpl_pagedesc = (VPageDescr *) repalloc(vpl->vpl_pagedesc, (vpl->vpl_num_pages + PG_NPAGEDESC) * sizeof(VPageDescr)); > vpl->vpl_pagedesc[vpl->vpl_num_pages] = vpnew; > (vpl->vpl_num_pages)++; > > > ************ > Check out "PostgreSQL Wearables" @ http://www.pgsql.com > > -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
pgsql-hackers by date: