Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type
Date
Msg-id 199911300633.BAA11308@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type  (Adriaan Joubert <a.joubert@albourne.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > Applied.  I am embarrassed to say I had a copy from June still in my
> > mailbox.
> 
> Don't be: they've been ready for a while, but I had to recheck them.
> When BIT and BIT VARYING are properly integrated, do I need to do
> something about regression tests?

Yes, we will need them to be added to the regression tests.  We can use
your test/ directory as a source for that.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type
Next
From: Christof Petig
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS