Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Adriaan Joubert
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type
Date
Msg-id 38436D49.16D5580F@albourne.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> 
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I can integrate the type for you into the include/catalog files if
> > > everyone agrees they want it as a standard type and not an contrib type.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >       Attached are the C-routines that implement a BIT and BIT VARYING type.
> > I know Bruce said he would integrate them, but he is writing a book at
> > the moment as well, so if somebody can explain to me how to go about
> > integrating it, or would like to have a go, go ahead.
> 
> Applied.  I am embarrassed to say I had a copy from June still in my
> mailbox.

Don't be: they've been ready for a while, but I had to recheck them.
When BIT and BIT VARYING are properly integrated, do I need to do
something about regression tests?

Adriaan


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Problems in 6.5.3 with Multi-Byte encoding
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type