frank wrote:
> Thanks Fabrice, that will help a lot.
>
> In my applications the conflict was not a direct table conflict e.g.
> USER1 locks Table1 record that references Table2 via foreign key with a
> cascade update/delete enforced then
> USER2 tried to lock Table2 for update on the referenced record - result both
> users locked !
>
> Is this the same scenario in your case ?
> perhaps a simple test db could used to resolve if this is the issue !
Looks like a deadlock situation not seen by the deadlock detection code. Unfortunately I'm not able to
reproduce a lockup with a simple test DB. Could you post a simple (trans1 does ..., trans2 does ...)
sample so we coule reproduce such a lockup?
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
