Re: How Postgresql Compares For Query And Load Operations - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Dr. Evil
Subject Re: How Postgresql Compares For Query And Load Operations
Date
Msg-id 20010721050741.10617.qmail@sidereal.kz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: How Postgresql Compares For Query And Load Operations  (Mark kirkwood <markir@slingshot.co.nz>)
List pgsql-general
Mark, thanks for sharing these results with us.  Interesting.  PG is
definitely slower, but not overwhelmingly slower.

I wonder how different the result would be if you had a huge amount of
RAM and allocated PG enough buffers to keep the entire table in RAM.
That would take OS IO considerations out of the question, right?  RAM
is very cheap these days.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Mark kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: How Postgresql Compares For Query And Load Operations
Next
From: x
Date:
Subject: COPY failure