again on index usage - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
| From | Daniel Kalchev |
|---|---|
| Subject | again on index usage |
| Date | |
| Msg-id | 200201071841.UAA26328@dcave.digsys.bg Whole thread Raw |
| Responses |
Re: again on index usage
|
| List | pgsql-hackers |
Hello,
I have an table with ca 1.7 million records, with the following structure:
Table "iplog_gate200112"Attribute | Type | Modifier
-----------+-----------+----------ipaddr | inet | input | bigint | output | bigint | router |
text | ipdate | timestamp |
Indices: iplog_gate200112_ipaddr_idx, iplog_gate200112_ipdate_idx
the following query
explain
SELECT sum(input) FROM iplog_gate200112
WHERE '2001-12-01 00:00:00+02' <= ipdate AND ipdate < '2001-12-02 00:00:00+02' AND '2001-12-01 00:00:00+02' <= ipdate
ANDipdate < '2002-01-01 00:00:00+02' AND network_subeq(ipaddr, '193.68.240.0/20') AND 'uni-gw' ~ router;
results in
NOTICE: QUERY PLAN:
Aggregate (cost=51845.51..51845.51 rows=1 width=8) -> Seq Scan on iplog_gate200112 (cost=0.00..51845.04 rows=190
width=8)
Why would it not want to use index scan?
Statistics for the table are as follows (from pg_statistic s, pg_attribute a,
pg_class c
where starelid = c.oid and attrelid = c.oid and staattnum = attnum
and relname = 'iplog_gate200112')
attname | attdispersion | starelid | staattnum | staop | stanullfrac |
stacommonfrac | stacommonval | staloval |
stahival
---------+---------------+-----------+-----------+-------+-------------+-------
--------+------------------------+------------------------+--------------------
----ipaddr | 8.85397e-05 | 190565949 | 1 | 1203 | 0 |
0.000441917 | 192.92.129.1 | 192.92.129.0 | 212.72.197.154input | 0.0039343 | 190565949 |
2 | 412 | 0 |
0.0183278 | 0 | 0 | 5929816798output | 0.724808 | 190565949 | 3
| 412 | 0 |
0.835018 | 0 | 0 | 2639435033router | 0.222113 | 190565949 | 4
| 664 | 0 |
0.416541 | sofia5 | bourgas1 | varna3ipdate | 0.014311 | 190565949 | 5 |
1322| 0 |
0.0580676 | 2001-12-04 00:00:00+02 | 2001-12-01 00:00:00+02 | 2001-12-31
00:00:00+02
(5 rows)
The query
explain
SELECT sum(input) FROM iplog_gate200112
WHERE ipdate < '2001-12-01 00:00:00+02' AND network_subeq(ipaddr, '193.68.240.0/20') AND 'uni-gw' ~ router;
produces
Aggregate (cost=4.91..4.91 rows=1 width=8) -> Index Scan using iplog_gate200112_ipdate_idx on iplog_gate200112
(cost=0.00..4.91 rows=1 width=8)
Note there are no records with ipdate < '2001-12-01 00:00:00+02' in the table.
Could anyone sched some light? This is on 7.1.3.
Daniel
pgsql-hackers by date: