Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks
Date
Msg-id 20020802132759.H83339-100000@mail1.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks  (Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info>)
Responses Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks
Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 10:39:47AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > Actually, plpgsql is pretty expensive too.  The thing to be benchmarking
> > is applications of plain old built-in-C functions and operators.
>
> I thought part of the justification for this was for the OpenACS
> guys; don't they write everything in TCL?

Nope, the OpenACS stuff relies on plpgsql functions ... the 'TCL' is the
web pages themselves, vs using something like PHP ... I may be wrong, but
I do not believe any of the functions are in TCL ...



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: []performance issues
Next
From: "J. R. Nield"
Date:
Subject: Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations