Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Daniel Wickstrom
Subject Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks
Date
Msg-id 15690.46270.371985.638480@edgedsp6.rtp.ericsson.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>)
Responses Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks
List pgsql-hackers
>>>>> "Marc" == Marc G Fournier <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
   Marc> On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Andrew Sullivan wrote:   >> On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 10:39:47AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >
>> Actually, plpgsql is pretty expensive too.  The thing to be   >> benchmarking > is applications of plain old
built-in-C  >> functions and operators.   >>    >> I thought part of the justification for this was for the   >>
OpenACSguys; don't they write everything in TCL?
 
   Marc> Nope, the OpenACS stuff relies on plpgsql functions ... the   Marc> 'TCL' is the web pages themselves, vs
usingsomething like   Marc> PHP ... I may be wrong, but I do not believe any of the   Marc> functions are in TCL ...
 

That's true.  We have intentionally avoided adding pl/tcl functions
into the db.  The postgresql db stuff relies extensively on plpgsql,
while the oracle db stuff relies on pl/sql to provide equivalent
functionality. 

On the other hand, all of the web server stuff is implemented on Aolserver
which uses Tcl as a scripting language.

Regards,

Dan


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jill Rabinowitz
Date:
Subject: Re: Outer join differences
Next
From: "Vitaliy N. Kravchenko"
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?