Re: Regression test failure date. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Regression test failure date. |
Date | |
Msg-id | 200307281605.h6SG5hU27860@candle.pha.pa.us Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Regression test failure date. (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Responses |
Re: Regression test failure date.
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
I am now seeing this error in 2003-03-03. CREATE TABLE INSERT_CHILD (cx INT default 42, cy INT CHECK (cy > x)) INHERITS (INSERT_TBL); + ERROR: RelationClearRelation: relation 130996 deleted while still in use --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I am testing this today. I found 2003-03-03 to not generate a failure > in 20 tests, so I am moving forward to April/May. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Robert Creager wrote: > -- Start of PGP signed section. > > > > I will stand by the fact that I cannot generate failures from > > 2003-02-15 (200+ runs), and I can from 2003-02-16. Just to make sure I > > didn't screw up the cvs usage, I'll try again tonight if I get the > > chance and re-download re-test these two days. > > > > I can set up a script that will step through weekly dates starting from > > 'now' and see if the 02-16 problem might of been fixed and then > > re-introduced if you like. > > > > 2003-02-16 fails 6/50 > > vacuum failed 1 times > > misc failed 3 times > > sanity_check failed 3 times > > inherit failed 1 times > > triggers failed 4 times > > > > Cheers, > > Rob > > > > On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 02:14:32 -0400 > > Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> said something like: > > > > > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > > > I have only been running nightly paralell regression runs since June > > > > 27, so it is possible that the paralell regression was broken in > > > > February, fixed in May, then broken some time after that. > > > > > > Any further progress on this? > > > > > > My best theory at the moment is that we have a problem with relcache > > > entry creation failing if it's interrupted by an SI inval message at > > > just the right time. I don't much want to grovel through six months > > > worth of changelog entries looking for candidate mistakes, though. > > > > > > regards, tom lane > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of > > > broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading > > > through Usenet, please send an appropriate > > > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that > > > your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > 06:57:40 up 10 days, 10:57, 2 users, load average: 2.17, 2.08, 1.83 > -- End of PGP section, PGP failed! > > -- > Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us > pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 > + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road > + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org) > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
pgsql-hackers by date: