Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Date
Msg-id 200505031840.18267.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
List pgsql-hackers
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Not really that ugly. It is just an extra compile step. Besides
> you don't have to package it just because it is in the Tarball.

Since you keep raising that point: Not packaging something is not a 
valid solution to something being hard to package.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Markus Schaber
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested?
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: distributed database