Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

3 May 2005

• 00:04   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Neil Conway
• 03:23   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Pavel Stehule
• 03:41   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Michael Paesold
• 03:45   BTW, if anyone wants to work on it... Tom Lane
• 04:35   Re: SPI bug. Thomas Hallgren
• 06:11   bitmap scan and explain analyze Tatsuo Ishii
• 06:46   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Dawid Kuroczko
• 06:57   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Hannu Krosing
• 06:57   Re: ARCHIVE TABLES (was: possible TODO: read-only Hannu Krosing
• 07:10   Re: ARCHIVE TABLES (was: possible TODO: read-only Hannu Krosing
• 07:12   Re: ARCHIVE TABLES (was: possible TODO: read-only Hannu Krosing
• 07:46   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Peter Eisentraut
• 07:55   Re: BTW, if anyone wants to work on it... Magnus Hagander
• 10:00   Regression tests des@des.no (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
• 10:38   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Stephen Frost
• 11:22   Re: pg_locks needs a facelift Merlin Moncure
• 11:27   Re: Regression tests Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 11:31   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Tom Lane
• 11:37   Re: bitmap scan and explain analyze Tom Lane
• 11:43   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Tom Lane
• 11:59   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Dave Held
• 12:08   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake
• 12:08   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier
• 13:34   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement Dave Held
• 13:36   distributed database mohammad izwan ibrahim
• 13:36   Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Markus Schaber
• 13:40   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Peter Eisentraut
• 13:47   Re: distributed database Peter Eisentraut
• 13:53   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Heikki Linnakangas
• 14:03   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Thomas Hallgren
• 14:08   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake
• 14:10   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake
• 14:11   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Robert Treat
• 14:12   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier
• 14:14   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake
• 14:14   A proper fix for the conversion-function problem Tom Lane
• 14:15   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake
• 14:20   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier
• 14:23   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake
• 14:37   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Decision Process WAS: Increased company Andrew Dunstan
• 14:39   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Tom Lane
• 14:46   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Andrew Dunstan
• 14:52   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Tom Lane
• 15:00   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Robert Treat
• 15:02   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Dave Held
• 15:09   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier
• 15:22   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier
• 15:26   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Andrew Dunstan
• 15:34   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake
• 15:36   Bogus assertion in multixact.c? Heikki Linnakangas
• 15:36   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Stephen Frost
• 15:41   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier
• 15:43   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Stephen Frost
• 15:44   Re: Bogus assertion in multixact.c? Tom Lane
• 15:44   Re: Bogus assertion in multixact.c? Alvaro Herrera
• 15:47   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Stephen Frost
• 15:48   Re: Bogus assertion in multixact.c? Tom Lane
• 15:49   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Andrew Dunstan
• 15:50   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Stephen Frost
• 15:50   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Peter Eisentraut
• 15:51   Re: Bogus assertion in multixact.c? Alvaro Herrera
• 15:52   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier
• 15:53   Re: Bogus assertion in multixact.c? Tom Lane
• 15:54   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake
• 15:54   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Stephen Frost
• 15:58   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Andrew Dunstan
• 16:19   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Dave Cramer
• 16:21   Re: Bogus assertion in multixact.c? Heikki Linnakangas
• 16:31   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Robert Treat
• 16:36   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier
• 16:40   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Joshua D. Drake
• 16:42   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Dave Cramer
• 17:01   [OT] Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Tom Copeland
• 17:36   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 
• 17:58   Re: Regression tests des@des.no (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
• 18:10   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Dave Held
• 18:20   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Tom Lane
• 18:33   Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Mischa Sandberg
• 18:33   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Thomas Swan
• 18:42   Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Josh Berkus
• 19:40   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Dave Held
• 19:50   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Doug McNaught
• 19:55   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Chuck McDevitt
• 19:59   Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 Oliver Jowett
• 20:57   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier
• 20:59   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Marc G. Fournier
• 21:14   Re: A proper fix for the conversion-function problem Tatsuo Ishii
• 21:51   Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Josh Berkus
• 21:56   Re: Regression tests Neil Conway
• 22:05   Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement Josh Berkus
• 23:19   Re: pg_locks needs a facelift Jim C. Nasby
• 23:20   Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement Andrew Dunstan
• 23:29   Re: A proper fix for the conversion-function problem Tom Lane
• 23:52   Re: [PERFORM] Bad n_distinct estimation; hacks suggested? Mischa Sandberg