Re: Limit + group + join - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tobias Brox
Subject Re: Limit + group + join
Date
Msg-id 20050828014240.GB5736@tobias.lan
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Limit + group + join  (Mark Kirkwood <markir@paradise.net.nz>)
List pgsql-performance
[Tom Lane]
> I looked into this and (...) I've committed some changes that hopefully will
> let 8.1 be smarter about GROUP BY ... LIMIT queries.

[Mark Kirkwood]
> Very nice :-)
(...)
> This is 8.1devel from today.

Splendid :-) Unfortunately we will not be upgrading for some monthes still,
but anyway I'm happy.  This provides yet another good argument for upgrading
sooner.  I'm also happy to see such a perfect match:

 - A problem that can be reduced from beeing complex and
   production-specific, to simple and easily reproducible.

 - Enthusiastic people testing it and pinpointing even more precisely what
   conditions will cause the condition

 - Programmers actually fixing the issue

 - Testers verifying that it was fixed

Long live postgresql! :-)

--
Notice of Confidentiality: This email is sent unencrypted over the network,
and may be stored on several email servers; it can be read by third parties
as easy as a postcard.  Do not rely on email for confidential information.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Mark Kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: Limit + group + join
Next
From: Arjen van der Meijden
Date:
Subject: Re: Inefficient queryplan for query with intersectable