Re: [HACKERS] HOT WIP Patch - version 2 - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] HOT WIP Patch - version 2
Date
Msg-id 200702201423.l1KENUq18139@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to HOT WIP Patch - version 2  ("Pavan Deolasee" <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] HOT WIP Patch - version 2
Re: [HACKERS] HOT WIP Patch - version 2
List pgsql-patches
Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> When following a HOT-update chain from the index fetch, if we notice that
> the root tuple is dead and it is HOT-updated, we try to prune the chain to
> the smallest possible length. To do that, the share lock is upgraded to an
> exclusive lock and the tuple chain is followed till we find a
> live/recently-dead
> tuple. At that point, the root t_ctid is made point to that tuple. In order

I assume you meant recently-dead here, rather than live/recently-dead,
because we aren't going to change live ctids, right?

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>          http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                               http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: "Pavel Stehule"
Date:
Subject: correct format for date, time, timestamp for XML functionality
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] HOT WIP Patch - version 2