Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> > ... this time, for maintenance.sgml.
>
> Applied, thanks. I'm wondering whether this should be
>
> <para>
> ! <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>'s
> ! <xref linkend="sql-vacuum" endterm="sql-vacuum-title"> command has to run on
> ! a regular basis for several reasons:
>
> instead. I didn't try to compile it so maybe the output is not OK.
OK, I need opinions on this issue. We currently have output that looks
like
"PostgreSQL's Vacuum (/Section 10.4.2/) command has to run ..."
(the part between // is a clickable link)
but with the patch above, it would show up as
"PostgreSQL's /Vacuum/ command has to run ..."
Is there a preferred way to link? I notice there is plenty of usage of
both forms.
I wonder what does printed output look like? Does it just just lose the
reference?
--
Alvaro Herrera Developer, http://www.PostgreSQL.org/
Al principio era UNIX, y UNIX habló y dijo: "Hello world\n".
No dijo "Hello New Jersey\n", ni "Hello USA\n".
