Tomas Doran wrote:
> On 28 Mar 2008, at 17:23, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Perhaps we could name it received_query() to indicate it is what the
>> backend received and it not necessarily the _current_ query.
>
> reveived_query() sounds like a very sane name for me, and documenting it
> as such would allow you to expose the functionality without the possible
> complaints...
client_query perhaps?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
