Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tomas Doran wrote:
>
> > On 28 Mar 2008, at 17:23, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >> Perhaps we could name it received_query() to indicate it is what the
> >> backend received and it not necessarily the _current_ query.
> >
> > reveived_query() sounds like a very sane name for me, and documenting it
> > as such would allow you to expose the functionality without the possible
> > complaints...
>
> client_query perhaps?
Yea, that is consistent with what we do with other functions.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
