Re: 3-days-long vacuum of 20GB table - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: 3-days-long vacuum of 20GB table
Date
Msg-id 20080418182422.GA11081@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 3-days-long vacuum of 20GB table  ("Jeffrey Baker" <jwbaker@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Jeffrey Baker escribió:

> That's rather more like it.  I guess I always imagined that VACUUM was
> a sort of linear process, not random, and that it should proceed at
> sequential scan speeds.

It's linear for the table, but there are passes for indexes which are
random in 8.1.  That code was rewritten by Heikki Linnakangas to do
linear passes for indexes in 8.2 AFAIR.

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: Message queue table..
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 3-days-long vacuum of 20GB table