Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?
Date
Msg-id 20090105164549.GG7345@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?
Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut escribió:
> James Mansion wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>>> c. Are there any well-known pitfalls/objections which would prevent 
>>>> me from
>>>>    changing the algorithm to something more efficient (read: IO-bound)?
>>>
>>> copyright licenses and patents
>>>   
>> Would it be possible to have a plugin facility?
>
> Well, before we consider that, we'd probably want to see proof about the  
>  effectiveness of other compression methods.

I did some measurements months ago, and it was very clear that libz
compression was a lot tighter than the PGLZ code.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Significantly larger toast tables on 8.4?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1386)