Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> + #
> + # Structure/union pointers in function prototypes and definitions have an extra
> + # space after the asterisk:
> + #
> + # void x(struct xxc * a);
>
>
> I know we should not be driven by our tools, but is there a case for a
> coding standard that requires use of a typedef name here?
We use things like struct timeval and struct tm ... I don't think we
should be creating typedefs for those, so it would be good to find a
more general solution.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
