Tom Lane wrote:
> Joshua Tolley <eggyknap@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 02:07:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I think this is pretty much nonsense --- most queries run all their plan
> >> nodes concurrently to some extent. You can't usefully say that a query
> >> is "on" some node, nor measure progress by whether some node is "done".
>
> > What about showing the outermost node where work has started?
>
> That's always the outermost node; what would it tell you?
[ Repost ]
I think the only resonable solution would be to consider the estimated
cost of each node and then compute what percentage complete each node
is.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
