Re: confusing archive_command example - Mailing list pgsql-docs
From | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Subject | Re: confusing archive_command example |
Date | |
Msg-id | 201003312339.o2VNdLq23837@momjian.us Whole thread Raw |
In response to | confusing archive_command example (Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com>) |
Responses |
Re: confusing archive_command example
Re: confusing archive_command example |
List | pgsql-docs |
Josh Kupershmidt wrote: > Hi, > On the page: > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/interactive/continuous-archiving.html#BACKUP-ARCHIVING-WAL > > an example archive_command of: > archive_command = 'cp -i %p /mnt/server/archivedir/%f </dev/null' > > is given. Then, a few lines later, an example archive command of: > archive_command = 'test ! -f .../%f && cp %p .../%f' > > is given. I think this second command would be more clear if it used > "/mnt/server/archivedir/" instead of "...", to tie in with the > previous archive_command. It took me a minute to figure out that the > three dots were supposed to be an ellipsis instead of a typo for the > parent directory "..". I agree our use of cp -i </dev/null is a little too fancy not to be explained in the docs, so I have done so with the attached, applied patch. As far as "...", those are used to show only the important changes in the string, which I think is the right approach, but I did change the line so the dots are not right up against slashes: archive_command = 'test ! -f ... %f && cp %p ... %f' -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com Index: doc/src/sgml/backup.sgml =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/backup.sgml,v retrieving revision 2.144 diff -c -c -r2.144 backup.sgml *** doc/src/sgml/backup.sgml 22 Feb 2010 17:15:10 -0000 2.144 --- doc/src/sgml/backup.sgml 31 Mar 2010 23:34:20 -0000 *************** *** 604,614 **** directory). It is advisable to test your proposed archive command to ensure that it indeed does not overwrite an existing file, <emphasis>and that it returns ! nonzero status in this case</>. We have found that <literal>cp -i</> does ! this correctly on some platforms but not others. If the chosen command ! does not itself handle this case correctly, you should add a command ! to test for existence of the archive file. For example, something ! like: <programlisting> archive_command = 'test ! -f .../%f && cp %p .../%f' </programlisting> --- 604,615 ---- directory). It is advisable to test your proposed archive command to ensure that it indeed does not overwrite an existing file, <emphasis>and that it returns ! nonzero status in this case</>. On many Unix platforms, <command>cp ! -i</> causes copy to prompt before overwriting a file, and ! <literal>< /dev/null</> causes the prompt (and overwriting) to ! fail. If your platform does not support this behavior, you should ! add a command to test for the existence of the archive file. For ! example, something like: <programlisting> archive_command = 'test ! -f .../%f && cp %p .../%f' </programlisting>
pgsql-docs by date: