On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 06:37:36AM +0500, Andrey Lepikhov wrote:
> On 20.11.2018 6:30, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Yeah, this one is not entirely true now. What about the following
>> instead:
>> - /* Buffer for current ReadRecord result (expandable) */
>> + /*
>> + * Buffer for current ReadRecord result (expandable), used when a record
>> + * crosses a page boundary.
>> + */
>
> I agree
Okay, I have committed this version, after checking that there were no
other spots.
--
Michael
