Re: SQL-standard function body - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Justin Pryzby
Subject Re: SQL-standard function body
Date
Msg-id 20210418211505.GA7256@telsasoft.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL-standard function body  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: SQL-standard function body
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 03:08:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes:
> > Should we be okay releasing v14 without support for breaking function
> > dependency loops, or does that call for an open item?
> 
> Oh!  That should definitely be an open item.  It doesn't seem
> that hard to do something similar to what we do for views,
> i.e. create a dummy function and replace it later.

I added
https://wiki.postgresql.org/index.php?title=PostgreSQL_14_Open_Items&type=revision&diff=35926&oldid=35925



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joel Jacobson"
Date:
Subject: Re: Planning time grows exponentially with levels of nested views
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL-standard function body