Re: SQL-standard function body - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: SQL-standard function body
Date
Msg-id 92408.1618772924@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL-standard function body  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Responses Re: SQL-standard function body
List pgsql-hackers
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes:
> Should we be okay releasing v14 without support for breaking function
> dependency loops, or does that call for an open item?

Oh!  That should definitely be an open item.  It doesn't seem
that hard to do something similar to what we do for views,
i.e. create a dummy function and replace it later.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL-standard function body
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: More info on pg_stat_activity Wait Event Name when is DataFileRead