On 2022-Jan-28, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> Have you looked at code coverage ? I have an experimental patch to add that to
> cirrus, and ran it with this patch; visible here:
> https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6362512059793408
Ah, thanks, this is useful. I think it is showing that the new code is
generally well covered, but there are some exceptions, particularly
ExecMergeMatched in some concurrent cases (TM_Deleted and
TM_SelfModified after table_tuple_lock -- those code pages have
user-facing errors but are not covered by any tests.)
How does this work? I notice it is reporting for
src/bin/pg_upgrade/relfilenode.c, but that file is not changed by this
patch.
--
Álvaro Herrera Valdivia, Chile — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
