Re: Inconsistent LSN format in pg_waldump output - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On 2025-Jul-03, Masahiko Sawada wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 10:56 PM Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Interesting. While this is a better format, could it break
> compatibility with existing tools that for example compares LSN
> strings?

I think a tool would have to be severely miswritten in order to become
broken from this change.  Our own code to scan LSNs is to use
scanf('%X/%X') which should work just fine with and without the leading
zeroes.  I honestly don't see anybody coding this in any different way
that could not cope with the leading zeroes :-)

> > > Agreed.  I believe %X/%08X is better.
> >
> > Patch to standardize LSN formatting with zero-padding.
> 
> Thank you for updating the patch. I think this patch doesn't need to
> update .po files as we do that at once when doing the translation
> update.

Agreed.  In fact these updates are probably harmful (they certainly
bloat the patch quite a bit).  These files come from a different
repository, which you're welcome to provide a patch for, after the code
change lands in Postgres.
https://git.postgresql.org/cgit/pgtranslation/messages.git/

-- 
Álvaro Herrera         PostgreSQL Developer  —  https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Porque Kim no hacía nada, pero, eso sí,
con extraordinario éxito" ("Kim", Kipling)