On 2025-Jul-06, Arseniy Mukhin wrote:
> Sorry, forget to run a full test run with the new patch version. Some
> tests were unhappy with the new unknown support function. Here the new
> version with the fix.
Hello, I think this patch is probably a good idea. I don't think it
makes sense to introduce a bunch of code in 0003 only to rewrite it
completely in 0005. I would ask that you re-split your WITHIN_RANGE
(0004) to appear before the amcheck code, and then write the amcheck
code using that new functionality.
> /*
> * Return a tuple descriptor used for on-disk storage of BRIN tuples.
> */
> -static TupleDesc
> +TupleDesc
> brtuple_disk_tupdesc(BrinDesc *brdesc)
I think we should give this function a better name if it's going to be
exported. How about brin_tuple_tupdesc? (in brin_tuple.h we
seem to distinguish "brin tuples" which are the stored ones, from "brin
mem tuples" which are the ones to be used in memory.)
I didn't read the other patches.
Thanks
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"I'm impressed how quickly you are fixing this obscure issue. I came from
MS SQL and it would be hard for me to put into words how much of a better job
you all are doing on [PostgreSQL]."
Steve Midgley, http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-sql/2008-08/msg00000.php
