Re: Performance issues with v18 SQL-language-function changes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Performance issues with v18 SQL-language-function changes
Date
Msg-id 2053311.1744830800@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Performance issues with v18 SQL-language-function changes  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Performance issues with v18 SQL-language-function changes
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 01:43:46PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm confused?  0dca5d68d didn't have anything to do with
>> syntax changes, just with when planning happens.

> I was referencing the contrib initialization functions you converted to
> use SQL-standard function bodies:

Nah, that's not really relevant.  The speed concerns I have here
are mostly independent of whether the SQL function is written
in string or SQL-standard form.  Also, I think all of those
contrib functions that are at all performance-relevant are
capable of being inlined, and so wouldn't reach this code anyway.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance issues with v18 SQL-language-function changes
Next
From: Greg Sabino Mullane
Date:
Subject: Re: Built-in Raft replication