Re: longjmp in psql considered harmful - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: longjmp in psql considered harmful
Date
Msg-id 20981.1150049292@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: longjmp in psql considered harmful  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Responses Re: longjmp in psql considered harmful
List pgsql-hackers
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 12:32:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think we should try very hard to get rid of the longjmp in the signal
>> handler altogether.

> I submitted a patch for this ages ago and AFAIK it's still in the
> queue. Have you any issues with the way I did it there?

If you're speaking of 
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-10/msg00194.php
it doesn't appear to me to remove longjmp from the signal handler.
Was there a later version?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: longjmp in psql considered harmful
Next
From: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Date:
Subject: pl/tcl regression failed