Logical Replication Setup using one replication slot per table? - Mailing list pgsql-admin
From | Sbob |
---|---|
Subject | Logical Replication Setup using one replication slot per table? |
Date | |
Msg-id | 24800418-6f52-067a-9adc-cd89fccda8cc@quadratum-braccas.com Whole thread Raw |
Responses |
Re: Logical Replication Setup using one replication slot per table? SOLVED
|
List | pgsql-admin |
Hi all; I setup logical replication by specifying 402 specific tables like shown below: On the Publisher: CREATE PUBLICATION testpub FOR TABLE my_test_schema.core_tab_00, my_test_schema.core_tab_01, -- and more tables my_test_schema.core_tab_401, my_test_schema.core_tab_402 ; On the Subscriber: CREATE SUBSCRIPTION testsub connection 'host=10.10.10.7 dbname=my_test_db port=5432' PUBLICATION testpub; Once I started replication I was seeing errors in the log on the subscriber about not enough replication slots, it seems the db wants to create a replication slot for each table, I grabbed all the rows with "could not create replication slot" and parsed the set to a unique list and came up with 385 rows like these: ERROR: could not create replication slot "pg_92884_sync_85377_7213515424408371294": ERROR: all replication slots are in use As I continue checking the number of unique "could not create replication slot" entries in the log is growing I have max_replication_slots on both servers set to 10 If i run this query on the publisher I see 10 rows: # select * from pg_stat_replication_slots ; slot_name | spill_txns | spill_count | spill_bytes | stream_txns | stream_count | stream_bytes | total_txns | total_bytes | stats_reset -----------------------------------------+------------+-------------+-------------+-------------+--------------+--------------+------------+-------------+------------- testsub2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | pg_92884_sync_81493_7213515424408371294 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | pg_92884_sync_71976_7213515424408371294 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | pg_92884_sync_72306_7213515424408371294 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | pg_92884_sync_71760_7213515424408371294 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | pg_92884_sync_74101_7213515424408371294 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | pg_92884_sync_74661_7213515424408371294 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | pg_92884_sync_71286_7213515424408371294 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | pg_92884_sync_82949_7213515424408371294 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | pg_92884_sync_81829_7213515424408371294 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | (10 rows) It seems that PostgreSQL wants to create a replication slot for each table, I did a test on a separate set of VMs before this with 50 tables and it only used one replication slot, what is going on? Am I doing something wrong?
pgsql-admin by date: