Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: new vacuum is slower for small tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: new vacuum is slower for small tables
Date
Msg-id 25178.1228750320@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: new vacuum is slower for small tables  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
I wrote:
> ... In particular we should at least try to bypass the pg_proc scan when
> there are *no* function stats records.

That idea, at least, looks to be trivial to implement; so I'll go do so.
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Chernow
Date:
Subject: Re: user-based query white list
Next
From: "Pavel Stehule"
Date:
Subject: Re: new vacuum is slower for small tables