Re: rand48 replacement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: rand48 replacement
Date
Msg-id 2520097.1632590602@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: rand48 replacement  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
Responses Re: rand48 replacement
List pgsql-hackers
Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> writes:
> Not enough. Here is a v14 which might improve things further more again. 
> Sorry for this noise due to blind windows tests.

Just FTR, I strongly object to your removal of process-startup srandom()
calls.  Those are not only setting the seed for our own use, but also
ensuring that things like random() calls within PL functions or other
libraries aren't 100% predictable.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: rand48 replacement
Next
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: Fixing WAL instability in various TAP tests