Re: [pgtranslation-translators] on gettext plural support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [pgtranslation-translators] on gettext plural support
Date
Msg-id 25665.1239548808@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgtranslation-translators] on gettext plural support  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: [pgtranslation-translators] on gettext plural support
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> I don't think there is much you can do here.  Either leave it out, or write 
> "CANNOT HAPPEN", or just translate normally.

But Alvaro's complaint that the current coding is incorrect for English
still stands, no?  Or does ngettext choose the second string for n = 0?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgtranslation-translators] on gettext plural support
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore dependencies