Re: RAM-only temporary tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: RAM-only temporary tables
Date
Msg-id 27417.1225988618@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: RAM-only temporary tables  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Right -- I don't expect we can make use of such an idea readily.  Not
> creating unnecessary pg_attribute entries for system columns is probably
> a lot easier to do.

I seem to recall having proposed that in the past, and getting shot down
on the basis that clients might be depending on those pg_attribute
entries being there.  I'm not sure how big a risk there really is ---
most of the code I've seen explicitly selects attnum > 0 --- but it's a
consideration.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ron Mayer
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch for ISO-8601-Interval Input and output.
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: plperl needs upgrade for Fedora 10