Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns
Date
Msg-id 291928.1737692506@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns
List pgsql-hackers
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 8:39 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I think the problem is not so much the underscore as the
>> inconsistency.  You've got "pub", "gen", and "cols" run together,
>> but then you feel a need to separate "type"?

> It was easy to read and to avoid getting a single word too long.
> However, I do understand your concern. so will change it to
> pubgencolstype unless you or someone prefers pubgencols?

I think I'd vote for "pubgencols".  I don't see what the "_type"
suffix is supposed to convey --- there is nothing very type-y about
this.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns
Next
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: Pgoutput not capturing the generated columns