Re: postgres8.3beta encodding problem? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: postgres8.3beta encodding problem?
Date
Msg-id 29305.1197992139@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: postgres8.3beta encodding problem?  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Responses Re: postgres8.3beta encodding problem?
List pgsql-general
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 10:13:54AM -0800, Jeff Davis wrote:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/release-8-3.html

> Ok, but that doesn't apply in this case, his database appears to be
> LATIN1 and this character is valid for that encoding...

You know what, I think the test in the code is backwards.

        is_mb = pg_encoding_max_length(encoding) > 1;

        if ((is_mb && (cvalue > 255)) || (!is_mb && (cvalue > 127)))
            ereport(ERROR,
                    (errcode(ERRCODE_PROGRAM_LIMIT_EXCEEDED),
                     errmsg("requested character too large for encoding: %d",
                            cvalue)));

Shouldn't we be allowing up-to-255 for single-byte encodings, not
multibyte?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: slony error --need help
Next
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres8.3beta encodding problem?