Re: SIGPIPE handling, take two. - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: SIGPIPE handling, take two.
Date
Msg-id 29923.1068560874@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SIGPIPE handling, take two.  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: SIGPIPE handling, take two.
List pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I think this is the patch I like.

The #if coding is messy and unnecessary.  You could do the test as per
the non-POSIX variant using two calls of pqsignal(), and not have any
system dependence here, nor a need for <signal.h>.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: mendola@bigfoot.com
Date:
Subject: cancel <3FB0C0CE.6050007@bigfoot.com>
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: SIGPIPE handling, take two.