Re: Allow escape in application_name - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Allow escape in application_name |
Date | |
Msg-id | 317b7edb-d3b9-e871-5ccf-e7e0b05ec521@oss.nttdata.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | RE: Allow escape in application_name ("kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>) |
Responses |
RE: Allow escape in application_name
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021/12/09 19:52, kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com wrote: > Dear Fujii-san > > Thank you for quick reviewing! I attached new ones. Thanks for updating the patches! >> Regarding 0001 patch, IMO it's better to explain that >> postgres_fdw.application_name can be any string of any length and contain even >> non-ASCII characters, unlike application_name. So how about using the following >> description, instead? >> >> ----------------- >> <varname>postgres_fdw.application_name</varname> can be any string of any >> length and contain even non-ASCII characters. However when it's passed to and >> used as <varname>application_name</varname> in a foreign server, note that it >> will be truncated to less than <symbol>NAMEDATALEN</symbol> characters >> and any characters other than printable ASCII ones in it will be replaced with >> question marks (<literal>?</literal>). >> ----------------- > > +1, Fixed. Could you tell me why you added new paragraph into the middle of existing paragraph? This change caused the following errorwhen compiling the docs. postgres-fdw.sgml:952: parser error : Opening and ending tag mismatch: listitem line 934 and para </para> How about adding that new paragraph just after the existing one, instead? >> Seems you removed the calls to pfree() from the patch. That's because the >> memory context used for the replaced application_name string will be released >> soon? Or it's better to call pfree()? > > Because I used escape_param_str() and get_connect_string() as reference, > they did not release the memory. I reconsidered here, however, and I agreed > it is confusing that only keywords and values are pfree()'d. > I exported char* data and execute pfree() if it is used. Understood. + /* + * The parsing result became an empty string, + * and that means other "application_name" will be used + * for connecting to the remote server. + * So we must set values[i] to an empty string + * and search the array again. + */ + values[i] = ""; Isn't pfree() necessary inside the loop also when data[0]=='\0' case? If so, probably "data" would need to be set to NULLjust after pfree(). Otherwise pfree()'d "data" can be pfree()'d again at the end of connect_pg_server(). >> + <entry><literal>%u</literal></entry> >> + <entry>Local user name</entry> >> >> Average users can understand what "Local" here means? > > Maybe not. I added descriptions and an example. Thanks! But, since the term "local server" is already used in the docs, we can use "the setting value of application_namein local server" etc? I agree that it's good idea to add the example about how escape sequences are replaced. Regards, -- Fujii Masao Advanced Computing Technology Center Research and Development Headquarters NTT DATA CORPORATION
pgsql-hackers by date: