Re: pg_dump problems: [archiver (db)] query failed: ERROR: relation"pg_opfamily" does not exist - Mailing list pgsql-general
From | Erwin Moller |
---|---|
Subject | Re: pg_dump problems: [archiver (db)] query failed: ERROR: relation"pg_opfamily" does not exist |
Date | |
Msg-id | 384ce3f0-79d7-b5d2-494d-4374eaddb7db@darwine.nl Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: pg_dump problems: [archiver (db)] query failed: ERROR: relation"pg_opfamily" does not exist (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>) |
Responses |
Re: pg_dump problems: [archiver (db)] query failed: ERROR: relation"pg_opfamily" does not exist
|
List | pgsql-general |
Op 8/20/2019 om 3:32 PM schreef Adrian Klaver: > On 8/20/19 6:18 AM, Erwin Moller wrote: >> >> >> Op 8/20/2019 om 2:07 PM schreef Ian Barwick: >>> On 8/20/19 7:12 PM, Erwin Moller wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> While trying to move an old 8.1 Postgres install to a new server >>>> with postgres 10.10, I get an error, listed hereunder: >>>> I am trying to get a mydump_x_x_x.sql file to use to reinstall on >>>> the target machine. >>>> >>>> From my new machine I connect to my old machine like this: >>>> erwin@ubuntu:~$ pg_dump -f "/home/erwin/mydump_$(date >>>> +%d_%m_%Y).sql" -C -h somehost.com -p 5433 -U myvalidusername -d >>>> myremotedb >>>> Password: >>>> pg_dump: [archiver (db)] query failed: ERROR: relation >>>> "pg_opfamily" does not exist >>>> pg_dump: [archiver (db)] query was: SELECT classid, objid, >>>> refclassid, refobjid, deptype FROM pg_depend WHERE deptype != 'p' >>>> AND deptype != 'e' >>>> UNION ALL >>>> SELECT 'pg_opfamily'::regclass AS classid, amopfamily AS objid, >>>> refclassid, refobjid, deptype FROM pg_depend d, pg_amop o WHERE >>>> deptype NOT IN ('p', 'e', 'i') AND classid = 'pg_amop'::regclass >>>> AND objid = o.oid AND NOT (refclassid = 'pg_opfamily'::regclass AND >>>> amopfamily = refobjid) >>>> UNION ALL >>>> SELECT 'pg_opfamily'::regclass AS classid, amprocfamily AS objid, >>>> refclassid, refobjid, deptype FROM pg_depend d, pg_amproc p WHERE >>>> deptype NOT IN ('p', 'e', 'i') AND classid = 'pg_amproc'::regclass >>>> AND objid = p.oid AND NOT (refclassid = 'pg_opfamily'::regclass AND >>>> amprocfamily = refobjid) >>>> ORDER BY 1,2 >>>> >>>> And no archive is created. >>>> >>>> Does any of you kind people have advice? I am sure this worked on >>>> postgres9. >>> >>> It looks like this was broken just before 10.10 was released, and >>> has since been fixed; >>> see: >>> >>> https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=6844adba54f7d96f30f834efc6d9aa1e52e5672d >>> >>> >>> Your options are: >>> - find a 10.9 or earlier package and use the pg_dump from that >>> - build pg_dump yourself >>> - wait for 10.11 to come out (though I imagine that won't be for a >>> month or two) >>> >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Ian Barwick >>> >> >> Thanks a lot, Ian! >> >> That saved me an upcoming headache. I searched a lot on Google but >> couldn't find any relevant information. >> >> Will installing Postgres 11 also work? (Not the Ubuntu18.04 default >> for Postgres, but doable). >> Or does those pg_dump versions also expect pg_opfamily to exist? > > > From the bug that introduced the issue: > > https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=07b39083c > > "Per bug #15934 from Tom Gottfried. Back-patch to all supported > branches." > > So I'm guessing it is in the most recent release of all current versions. Thank you, Adrian. That is a bummer. Since I have no idea how to safely install an older version of pg_dump alongside my current 10.10 install, I will wait for the patch. Thank you for your responses! Regards, Erwin Moller
pgsql-general by date: