Re: define pg_structiszero(addr, s, r) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: define pg_structiszero(addr, s, r)
Date
Msg-id 3969083.1730128111@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: define pg_structiszero(addr, s, r)  (Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: define pg_structiszero(addr, s, r)
List pgsql-hackers
Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> writes:
> It seems to me that [reversing the loop direction] is more optimized.

That's far from clear: you're ignoring the possibility that memory
access logic is better optimized for forward scanning than reverse
scanning.  I'd stick with the forward scan without some extremely
detailed testing.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Alias of VALUES RTE in explain plan
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Assertion failure when autovacuum drops orphan temp indexes.