Re: Performance on inserts - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Lockhart
Subject Re: Performance on inserts
Date
Msg-id 39A71F39.6931B3B@alumni.caltech.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to [jules@jellybean.co.uk: Performance on inserts]  (Jules Bean <jules@jellybean.co.uk>)
Responses Re: Performance on inserts
List pgsql-hackers
> Comments?  Is there a better way?  What's the best probability to use?

For this particular example, "partial indices" seems to be the best fit.
The index can be chosen to omit the most common value(s), since those
would indicate a sequential scan anyway.

Other DBs allow a parameter to set the "fill ratio" of index pages,
which might also help. But probably not as much as you might like when
one is doing a large number of inserts at a time.

Your "randomized" algorithm looks very promising. What is the status of
partial indices? Are they functional now, or have they been broken
forever (I'm not recalling)?
                - Thomas


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance on inserts
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance on inserts