Re: We shouldn't signal process groups with SIGQUIT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: We shouldn't signal process groups with SIGQUIT
Date
Msg-id 41604.1677076795@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: We shouldn't signal process groups with SIGQUIT  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: We shouldn't signal process groups with SIGQUIT
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> What would be the advantage of doing that for groups other than
> -StartupPID and -PgArchPID?  These are the two groups of processes we
> need to worry about, AFAIK.

No, we have the issue for regular backends too, since they could be
executing COPY FROM PROGRAM or the like (not to mention that functions
in plperlu, plpythonu, etc could spawn child processes).

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Maxim Orlov
Date:
Subject: Re: XID formatting and SLRU refactorings (was: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15)
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: LWLock deadlock in brinRevmapDesummarizeRange