Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Date
Msg-id 4277C430.9080807@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Increased company involvement  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Mitch Pirtle wrote:
> On 4/30/05, Jim C. Nasby <decibel@decibel.org> wrote:
>
>>If money's not an issue anymore, can we get a bigger box to host
>>pgfoundry on then? :)
>
>
> If you guys are planning on running Gforge, then you better make 'box' plural.

Well we already run it :) For pgFoundry and you are correct it seems to
be a bit of a pig. Our new machines should handle it better though.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



--
Your PostgreSQL solutions company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Programming, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedication Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Bogus assertion in multixact.c?