Re: Postmaster Out of Memory - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Jeff Gold
Subject Re: Postmaster Out of Memory
Date
Msg-id 42BF0147.30509@mazunetworks.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Postmaster Out of Memory  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Tom Lane wrote:
> Found it --- the actual leak is in index_create, not in TRUNCATE or
> CLUSTER at all; and it's been there a really long time.
> Patch for 7.4 branch attached.

Excellent!  Does index_create refer to something that is invoked as a
consequence of CREATE INDEX?  I'm looking through the code on our side
and can't find any obvious places where we recreate indexes, but I might
just be missing something.  Might it be a conseuence of repulating a
recently truncated table instead?  I'll confer with Joe on this new
information tomorrow.  Thanks for taking the time to look into this.

                                         Jeff



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Marco Colombo
Date:
Subject: Re: Win32 users?
Next
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: Web application development on Win32, deployment on Linux