Re: Code of Conduct plan - Mailing list pgsql-general
From | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Code of Conduct plan |
Date | |
Msg-id | 42a7ab31-7e49-fc1b-d6b7-2c04a7923432@commandprompt.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Code of Conduct plan (Gavin Flower <GavinFlower@archidevsys.co.nz>) |
Responses |
Re: Code of Conduct plan
Re: Code of Conduct plan Re: Code of Conduct plan Re: Code of Conduct plan Re: Code of Conduct plan |
List | pgsql-general |
On 06/03/2018 04:08 PM, Gavin Flower wrote: >> My comments: >> >> 1) Reiterate my contention that this is a solution is search of >> problem. Still it looks like it is going forward, so see below. >> >> 2) "... engaging in behavior that may bring the PostgreSQL project >> into disrepute, ..." >> This to me is overly broad and pulls in actions that may happen >> outside the community. Those if they are actually an issue should be >> handled where they occur not here. This is good point. There are those who would think that one has performed an action that brings the project into disrepute and a similar sized bias that suggests that in fact that isn't the case. This based on the CoC would be judged by the CoC committee. It is my hope that PostgreSQL.Org -Core chooses members for that committee that are exceedingly diverse otherwise it is just an echo chamber for a single ideology and that will destroy this community. >> >> 3) "... members must be sensitive to conduct that may be considered >> offensive by fellow members and must refrain from engaging in such >> conduct. " >> Again overly broad, especially given the hypersensitivity of people >> these days. I have found that it is enough to disagree with someone to >> have it called offensive. This section should be removed as proscribed >> behavior is called out in detail in the paragraphs above it. "considered offensive by fellow members" Is definitely too broad. The problem comes in here: > I might possibly say that "I'm the master in this area" when talking to > someone on a technical subject. In the sense that I'm better at that > particular skill, but some hypersensitive American could get their > knickers in a twist (notice, that in this context, no gender is implied > -- also in using that that expression "get their knickers in a twist" > could offend some snowflake) claiming that I'm suggesting that whoever "snowflake", I find that term hilarious others find it highly offensive. Which is correct? > I'm talking to is my slave! I heard of an American university that > doesn't want people to use the term master, like in an MSc, because of > the history of slavery. The PostgreSQL project already has this problem, note we don't use the terms Master and Slave in reference to replication anymore. > > I've used the expressions "sacrifice a willing virgin" and "offering my > first born to the gods" as ways to ensure success of resolving a > technical issue. The people I say that to, know what I mean -- and they > implicitly know that I'm not seriously suggesting such conduct. Yet, if > I wrote that publicly, it is conceivable that someone might object! Yes and that is a problem. We need to have some simple barrier of acceptance that we are all adults here (or should act like adults). Knowing your audience is important. > Consider a past advertising campaign in Australia to sell government > Bonds. They used two very common hand gestures that are very > Australian. Bond sales dropped. On investigation, they found the bonds > were mainly bought by old Greek people, who found the gestures obscene. > The gestures? Thumbs up, and the okay gesture formed by touching the > thumb with the next finger -- nothing sexually suggestive to most > Australians, but traditional Greeks found them offensive. Using Australia as an example, my understanding is that the word c**t is part of nomenclature but in the states the word is taboo and highly frowned upon. > Be very careful in attempting to codify 'correct' behaviour! > Correct. I think one way to look at all of this is, "if you wouldn't say it to your boss or a client don't say it here". That too has problems but generally speaking I think it keeps the restrictions rational. JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc *** A fault and talent of mine is to tell it exactly how it is. *** PostgreSQL centered full stack support, consulting and development. Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://postgresconf.org ***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****
pgsql-general by date: